Xylitol vs Erythritol
First, if there is a dog in the house: xylitol is life-threatening to dogs. In dogs it triggers a large insulin release and a dangerous drop in blood sugar within 10 to 60 minutes, and serious effects can be delayed 12 to 24 hours, so a dog that seems fine still needs a vet. It is also sold as birch sugar or wood sugar, and turns up in gum, mints, sugar-free candy, baked goods, some nut butters and toothpaste. Erythritol carries no such warning in our record. For a household with a dog, that settles the choice before anything below.
Beyond that, xylitol and erythritol are the two sugar alcohols people actually choose between, and they are less alike than the shared label suggests. Xylitol tastes about as sweet as sugar and carries real calories; erythritol is noticeably less sweet and is the only sugar alcohol with a zero calorie factor. Xylitol has the better-supported benefit, for teeth. Both carry an open cardiovascular question.
At a Glance
Every row below comes from our two sourced records, the same ones the cards at the foot of this page show. Each figure links to the document it came from and the date we last checked it; open “Note” for the qualifications that go with it. Where a record has nothing sourced for a row, the cell says so rather than filling the gap.
| Attribute | Xylitol | Erythritol |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard | Life-threatening to dogsUS Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine regulatory checked 30 Aug 2026NoteMECHANISM: in humans xylitol does not stimulate insulin release; in dogs it is absorbed rapidly and triggers a potent insulin release, causing profound hypoglycaemia within 10 to 60 MINUTES. Signs: vomiting, then decreased activity, weakness, staggering, incoordination, collapse, seizures. Serious effects can be delayed 12 to 24 hours, so a well-looking dog still needs a vet. Also called BIRCH SUGAR or WOOD SUGAR on labels. Present in gum, mints, sugar-free candy, baked goods, cough syrup, chewable vitamins, mouthwash, toothpaste, some peanut and nut butters, and "skinny" ice cream. Ferrets are also affected; cats appear largely spared. Never use human toothpaste on a pet. | No sourced entry |
| Sweetness | 98–112% of sugarWee MSM, Tan VWK, Forde CG; Nutrients 10(11):1632 peer reviewed checked 31 Aug 2026NoteA FRACTION, not a multiple — xylitol is a BULK sweetener like erythritol, not a high-intensity one; see the monk-fruit record's header for why that distinction is load-bearing for this field name. Concentration-dependent, from the SAME 16-sweetener psychophysical dose-response study already cited narratively for erythritol's sweetness (Wee, Tan & Forde 2018) but not previously given its own source entry here: matching concentrations required to equal 5/10/15% w/v sucrose were 5.1/9.9/13.3% w/v xylitol, giving relative potency 0.98/1.01/1.12 — essentially equisweet to sucrose across the tested range, trending slightly SWEETER than sucrose at the higher concentration rather than under-sweet like erythritol. This is a single peer-reviewed measurement, not a regulatory specification band (no JECFA/EFSA specification document found stating a sweetness figure for xylitol on this pass) — treat the range as what one controlled sensory panel measured, not as an official spec. | 60–80% of sugarEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings, EFSA Journal… regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NoteSpecification band. Measured potency is concentration-dependent: 0.72 / 0.75 / 0.84 against 5 / 10 / 15% w/v sucrose (Wee 2018); 0.50-0.78 across 3-20% (Fujimaru 2012). |
| Calories | 2.4 kcal per gramCornell Legal Information Institute (eCFR text) regulatory checked 30 Aug 2026NoteThe HIGHEST of any polyol FDA assigns a factor to, and 60% of sugar's 4 kcal/g — nowhere near erythritol's 0. The full FDA table: erythritol 0, mannitol 1.6, isomalt 2.0, lactitol 2.0, maltitol 2.1, xylitol 2.4, sorbitol 2.6, hydrogenated starch hydrolysates 3.0. Anyone treating "sugar alcohol" as a single low-calorie category is wrong by a factor of infinity at one end of that list. | 0 kcal per gramElectronic Code of Federal Regulations regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026 |
| Net carbs | 50% of its grams still countCornell Legal Information Institute (eCFR text) regulatory checked 30 Aug 2026NoteCONSERVATIVE ASSIGNMENT, and deliberately not subtract_full. At 2.4 kcal/g xylitol carries real metabolisable energy, unlike erythritol at 0. No fetched source gives a xylitol glycaemic index on this pass, so the record takes the half-counting treatment rather than under-reporting carbohydrate to a reader managing diabetes. Revisit when a GI is sourced. | Subtracts in full — none of its grams countElectronic Code of Federal Regulations regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NoteFDA assigns erythritol 0 cal/g, uniquely among polyols (all others 2.0-3.0). Glycaemic index 0. |
| Blood glucose | No sourced entry | 0 (glucose = 100)Livesey G, Nutrition Research Reviews 16:163-191 peer reviewed checked 29 Aug 2026NoteMean 0, SD 17 across 4 studies (glucose = 100). Insulinaemic index 2. The SD is large relative to the mean: this is "no detectable effect", not a precise zero. |
| Acceptable daily intake | No sourced entry | EU 0.5 g per kg body weight per dayEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings, EFSA Journal… regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NoteEFSA pooled NOAELs for diarrhoea from 10 human studies: range 0.51-1.0 g/kg bw, median 0.75. EFSA adopted the lower bound, 0.5 g/kg bw/day, as its first numerical ADI for erythritol (Dec 2023) and found children's 95th-percentile intake already exceeds it. |
| Digestive tolerance | No sourced entry | 0.5–1 g/kg in one sitting · EU limit 0.5 g/kg per dayEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings, EFSA Journal… regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NoteEFSA pooled NOAELs for diarrhoea from 10 human studies: range 0.51-1.0 g/kg bw, median 0.75. EFSA adopted the lower bound, 0.5 g/kg bw/day, as its first numerical ADI for erythritol (Dec 2023) and found children's 95th-percentile intake already exceeds it. |
| Browning | No sourced entry | NoneEuropean Commission regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NotePolyols do not participate in Maillard browning; the additive specification caps reducing substances at 0.3% as D-glucose. |
| Bulk contribution | No sourced entry | BulkingEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings, EFSA Journal… regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NoteUsed as a bulk sweetener, but a 1:1 weight swap under-sweetens because it delivers only 60-80% of sucrose sweetness. |
| Recrystallisation | No sourced entry | HighTyapkova et al. peer reviewed checked 29 Aug 2026NoteLow solubility relative to sucrose; recrystallises on cooling, which is the mechanism behind the gritty or sandy texture in baked goods and frozen desserts. |
| United States | Permitted sugar alcoholCornell Legal Information Institute (eCFR text) regulatory checked 30 Aug 2026NoteNamed in FDA's nutrition-labelling caloric factors for sugar alcohols at 21 CFR 101.9(c)(1)(i)(F). | GRAS by notificationUS Food and Drug Administration regulatory checked 27 Oct 2026NoteSix FDA "no questions" letters, per FDA's GRAS Notice Inventory (checked 2026-10-27): GRN 76 (closed 2001-09-11), 208 (2007-01-25), 382 (2011-11-21), 401 (2012-03-22), 789 (Cargill, 2019-02-20) and 1296 (Shandong Starlight So True, 2026-04-07), the last for erythritol "produced through fermentation of glucose by Yarrowia lipolytica". CORRECTED 2026-10-27: this note previously said six letters ran from GRN 76 through GRN 789, which is five. The production organism now varies by supplier, so prose naming only Moniliella is incomplete. Intended uses in GRN 1296 exclude infant formula and USDA-regulated products. |
| European Union | Authorised, E 967European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety —… regulatory checked 31 Aug 2026NoteADDED 2026-08-31 — this field was previously missing entirely, verified directly against the EU Food Additives register. E 967, member of Group IV, Polyols (same group as erythritol E968, sorbitol E420, mannitol E421, isomalt E953, maltitol E965), carrying quantum satis authorisation across roughly 30 energy-reduced/no-added-sugar food categories under Reg (EU) No 1129/2011. See erythritol's eu_status note for the two-layer mechanism (substance-specific entries plus group authorisation). | Authorised, E 968EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings, EFSA Journal… regulatory checked 29 Aug 2026NoteVERIFIED DIRECTLY against the EU Food Additives register, 2026-08-31 — do not confuse the two authorisation layers. The substance-specific listing for erythritol shows only ONE category (14.1.4, flavoured drinks, as a flavour enhancer, ML 16000 mg/l, energy-reduced/no-added-sugar only, under Reg (EU) 2015/1832) — reading only that would wrongly suggest erythritol is authorised for almost nothing. The real authorisation is broader: erythritol is a member of GROUP IV, POLYOLS, alongside sorbitol (E420), mannitol (E421), isomalt (E953), maltitol (E965) and xylitol (E967), and Group IV carries its own quantum satis authorisation across roughly 30 food categories (energy-reduced or no-added-sugar foods) under Reg (EU) No 1129/2011. EFSA re-evaluation Dec 2023 established an ADI of 0.5 g/kg bw/day and declined to remove the laxative warning required for foods containing more than 10% erythritol. |
Sweetness and Calories
In a sensory study that compared 16 sweeteners, xylitol matched sugar almost exactly, at 98–112% of sugar’s sweetness across the concentrations tested, slightly sweeter at the highest. That is one panel’s measurement rather than an official specification, but it means xylitol can replace sugar by weight. Erythritol’s specification band is 60–80% of sugar’s sweetness, so a weight-for-weight swap under-sweetens.
The calorie gap is wide. FDA assigns xylitol 2.4 kcal/g, the highest of the sugar alcohols it lists and 60% of sugar’s 4 kcal/g. It assigns erythritol 0, the only sugar alcohol at zero. “Sugar alcohol” is not one low-calorie category.
Net Carbs and Blood Sugar
Erythritol’s glycemic index is 0, averaged across four studies, and it subtracts in full from net carbs. Our xylitol record has no sourced glycemic index, so it takes a deliberately conservative line: half of xylitol’s grams still count. Xylitol carries real metabolizable energy, and we would rather over-count than under-report carbohydrate to someone managing diabetes. That will be revisited when a glycemic index can be sourced.
On a US label, both count in Total Carbohydrate and neither counts in Total Sugars.
Teeth
Xylitol’s specific benefit is dental. A systematic review of controlled trials found xylitol gum lowered mutans streptococci counts in 12 of 14 studies, reduced plaque in 6 of 10 and reduced cavities in 3 of 5. The comparison was against sorbitol gum, not against no gum, so some of the effect is chewing, and xylitol is an addition to brushing, fluoride and dental care, not a substitute. Our erythritol record makes no dental claim.
Digestion and Texture
EFSA pooled ten human studies of erythritol and found diarrhea thresholds of 0.5–1 g per kg of body weight in a single dose. In 2023 it set erythritol’s acceptable daily intake at 0.5 g/kg a day, found children’s high intakes already exceed it, and kept the EU laxative warning on foods with more than 10% erythritol. Our xylitol record has no sourced tolerance figure, so we do not give one here.
In the kitchen, erythritol does not brown, has the strongest cooling effect of the common sugar alcohols, and recrystallizes as foods cool, which leaves a gritty texture. Our xylitol record has no sourced figures on browning, cooling or recrystallization, so this page does not compare them.
The Cardiovascular Question
Both polyols have the same kind of open question, and it should be stated plainly for both.
For xylitol: a 2024 study in the European Heart Journal found that people in the top third of blood xylitol had a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted HR 1.57 in a validation cohort of 2,149), along with lab findings that xylitol made platelets more reactive. Larger data presented at the ESC Congress in August 2026, from two cohorts totaling 17,710 people, found higher risk in the top quarter of blood xylitol in both (adjusted HR 1.47 and 1.18). Those data are conference-stage and not yet peer-reviewed.
For erythritol: a 2023 study in Nature Medicine linked higher blood erythritol to a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events; the ARIC study linked it to heart-failure hospitalization, cardiovascular death and death from any cause; and three genetic studies published in 2025 and 2026 found higher genetically predicted erythritol going with higher odds of stroke or coronary disease.
The caveats apply to both. These studies measure the sweetener in the blood, not in the diet, and the body makes both itself: roughly 5–15 g of xylitol a day, and erythritol from glucose. In the Nurses’ Health Study, the same size of association showed up for mannitol and sorbitol, polyols almost nobody eats in quantity, which is what a shared metabolic explanation would look like; the erythritol association also faded once diabetes was accounted for. A 2025 review that concluded causation is lacking noted patients given up to 120 g a day of intravenous xylitol without attributable harm, though that review carries an industry conflict. Neither sweetener has been restricted by a regulator. Neither signal is settled.
Regulatory Status
Both are authorized in the EU under the same group authorization for polyols: xylitol as E 967, erythritol as E 968. In the US, xylitol is a permitted sugar alcohol named in FDA’s labeling rules, and erythritol is GRAS by notification, with six FDA “no questions” letters between 2001 and 2026.
Which Should You Choose
If there is a dog in the home, choose erythritol, or keep xylitol products where a dog cannot reach them under any circumstances. For teeth, xylitol gum or mints have the trial evidence. For replacing sugar by weight, xylitol’s sweetness is the closer match, at the cost of 2.4 kcal/g. For the fewest calories and carbs, erythritol, within its daily limit.
The Bottom Line
Xylitol is a sugar reducer rather than a sugar eliminator: as sweet as sugar, 60% of its calories, the only sweetener we cover with a specific, trial-supported benefit (dental, as an adjunct), and a household hazard for dogs. Erythritol is the zero-calorie, zero-GI option, with a digestive limit lower than most people assume. Both carry a cardiovascular association measured in the blood, not yet shown to come from diet, and worth knowing about if you already have heart risk factors.
New comparisons and corrections, as they land.
This page is educational information, not medical or dietary advice. Nutrition and regulatory details change over time — verify against the cited primary sources before relying on them for formulation or health decisions.